Based on Chris Selley article he talks about the difference between wealthy and poor public schools. Public schools full of rich kids tend to raise more money than public schools full of poor kids. The Social Planning Toronto’s report states the massive fundraising imbalances among the cities public schools, talking about the differences of up $500 and even $1000 per student during the school year of 2008-09. Banning parent donations and having the government pay for all the funds will not do the schools any improvement, says Tasha Kheiriddin, who wrote a related article to Chris Selleys. They would rather go with Plan B - taking in all the donations from parents and distribute them evenly.
Among the TDSB schools ranked by the Fraser Institute based on standard test scores, the top 10 fundraisers brought $515 per student and got an average of 8.75 out of 10. The bottom 10 fundraisers brought $17 per student and had an average of 5.3. Or another way to look at this is that the top 10 TDSB schools in Fraser institute that ranked a 10 or 9.9 raised an average of $164.45 and the bottom 10 which had an average of 2.3 only raised an average of $58.64. But there is no connection between the fundraising and academic achievement because one of the top 10 schools that did well academically, was the ranked at the bottom 10 TDSB for fundraising.
This article tells that rich kids in a wealthy public school tend to do better if they have a lot of money than poor kids that tend to do worst with not a lot of money. In the article, it states that each student in the wealthier school raised about $500 per student as where the poorer school would raised $17. This relates to the wealthier doing better in school because the wealthier school standardized test scores have an average of 8.75 out 10 and the poor school has an average of 2.3 This comes to show that more money helps you get more out of an education. As in the less money you have, you do the best with what you got.
In the article where it says, “Officially, the provincial curriculum should be available to all students without a single extra dime being paid.” Honestly, this is true because not everyone can afford to pay all the expenses of school, which means students can’t participate in some activities as in the wealthier school can. Also in the article its says, “People have always discussed the importance of social inequalities, but nobody denies the importance of education,” which means that even though we’ve discussed the unfairness in the system, everyone thinks that the kids deserves a proper education no matter if you’re in a wealthy or poor school.